Garlic Mustard: Stewardship Network May Webcast
Time: 12 noon to 1pm Eastern
Place: Your Computer!
(Link will become live day of webcast)
____________________________________________
The latest news on the detection and monitoring of pests in Illinois.
The Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team was created by the
Deputy Chief for State and Private Forestry in February 1995 to develop
and deliver forest health technology services to field personnel in
public and private organizations in support of the Forest Service's land
ethic, to "promote the sustainability of ecosystems by ensuring their
health, diversity, and productivity."
by CHRIS YOUNG
Photo via Wikipedia: Hydrilla verticillata collection LakeSeminoleFL.jpg |
CHAMPAIGN, lll. – Like most invasive plants introduced to the U.S. from Europe and other places, garlic mustard first found it easy to dominate the natives. A new study indicates that eventually, however, its primary weapon – a fungus-killing toxin injected into the soil – becomes less potent.
The study, in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, is one of the first to show that evolutionary forces can alter the very attributes that give an invasive plant its advantage. In fact, the study suggests the plant’s defenses are undermined by its own success.
Garlic mustard comes from a family of smelly, sharp-tasting plants that includes cabbage, radish, horseradish and wasabi. Unlike most plants, which rely on soil fungi to supplement them with phosphorous, nitrogen and water, garlic mustard gets by without the extra help, said Richard Lankau, a postdoctoral researcher at the Illinois Natural History Survey (INHS) at the University of Illinois. Lankau led the study with INHS plant ecologist Greg Spyreas.
“For whatever reason, these plants just don’t hook up with the soil fungus,” Lankau said. Instead, garlic mustard produces glucosinolates, pungent compounds that leach into the soil and kill off many soil fungi, especially those native to North America. This weakens the native plants. As a result, garlic mustard now grows in dense patches in many North American woodlands, its preferred habitat. Those patches are often devoid of native plants.
Lankau began the new study with a seemingly obvious question: Once garlic mustard has vanquished most of its competitors, why would it invest as much in maintaining its toxic arsenal? He predicted – correctly, it turns out – that levels of glucosinolates in the plant would diminish over time.
“When you’re in a situation where the only thing you’re competing with is other garlic mustard, it may be that making lots of this chemical is not a very good idea,” he said.
Thanks to a study of historic herbarium records conducted by co-author Victoria Nuzzo, of Natural Area Consultants, N.Y., the researchers had access to a 140-year record of the age of garlic mustard populations across the eastern half of the U.S. The team collected garlic mustard seeds from 44 locations, grew them in a greenhouse and tested glucosinolate levels in each. Those tests found that older populations – those that have been present in an area for more than 30 years – produced lower levels of the fungicidal compounds than those that got their start less than two decades ago, Lankau said.
Genetic studies suggested that these patterns were the result of natural selection. That is, the plants that produced less of the toxin were more likely to survive and reproduce in older populations.
The researchers then grew the garlic mustard in soil from native woodlands. After a time, they removed these plants and potted native trees in the same soil. The trees did best in pots that had held plants from older populations of garlic mustard, indicating, again, that the plants’ toxin output had diminished over time, killing less of the fungus on which the native plants relied.
To determine if the decline in glucosinolate production was allowing native plants to return to areas previously dominated by garlic mustard in the wild, the researchers turned to a unique data set available in Illinois. The Critical Trends Assessment Program (CTAP) is a
long-term initiative funded by the state Department of Natural Resources and administered by the INHS that monitors the status of plants, birds and insects across the state every five years. The CTAP began in 1997, and so data from the first two sampling periods were used (1997-2001 and 2002-2007)
Because CTAP includes data on plant abundance, including garlic mustard and native plants from across the state, the researchers were able to determine if native plants were declining or advancing in the presence of garlic mustard. Again, they found that older populations of garlic mustard – though still problematic – posed less of a threat to native plants than the newer ones did.
While this study focused on only one plant, the results indicate that some invasive plants evolve in ways that may make them more manageable over time, Spyreas said. This suggests that conservation efforts might be more effective if they focus on the most recently invaded areas, which – in the case of garlic mustard, at least – is probably where the most damage occurs.
This study was funded by the Agriculture and Food Research Initiative at the U.S. Department of Agriculture and by the Illinois Department of Natural Resources. The research team also included Adam Davis, of the Agricultural Research Service at the USDA.
Garlic mustard in an exotic, invasive plant that was originally brought the United States by early settlers. It is widely distributed throughout Illinois and can be found in forested areas, roadsides, and ditches.
This biennial plant produces a rosette of dark green kidney or heart shaped leaves with scalloped margins the first year of growth. The leaves emit a pungent odor when bruised. During the second year, the plant sends a 1 to 3 foot flower stalk in mid-spring. This plant is readily identifiable in mid-May in forested areas. Its stems have white flowers in small clusters with 4 petals each. Flowers turn into seeds that fade from tan to black and finally split open by mid-summer.
Garlic mustard is a very dominating plant that can establish quickly and outcompete native plants for nutrients, light, and water. Each plant produces hundreds of seeds that can be dispersed by animals, humans, and even flowing water.
Small infestations of garlic mustard can be eradicated by hand pulling plants during their first year or before seed set their second year. Also, cutting the stalk as close to the soil surface as possible as flowering begins may also be effective. Larger infestations may require chemical applications (glyphosate). Recommended treatments times are late fall or early spring as this is a nonselective herbicide and most other plants are dormant during this time frame.
For more information on other pests found around your home and garden, visit the Home, Yard, and Garden Newsletter.
By John Keilman, Chicago Tribune reporter
Across the Midwest, scientists are fighting an invasion of exotic, fast-spreading plants with imported insects that have one simple mission:
Eat and destroy.
It's an old agricultural tactic known as biological control, used here in recent years to dramatically cut down the scourge of purple loosestrife. Researchers are now looking into new bugs to sic on other plants in the rogues' gallery of Illinois vegetation: garlic mustard and buckthorn.
The insects travel and sustain themselves, so they can be a herbicide-free way to stop marauding plants on public and private property alike. For area homeowners it could mean getting control of their yards without putting down gallons of spray.
But the strategy is not without risk. Some alien insects are only moderately effective while others have become nuisances, chewing up flora they were not supposed to eat and spreading far beyond their intended boundaries.
It leaves even some practitioners of biological control uneasy about the potential consequences of unleashing new waves of miniature mercenaries.
"There's always that apprehension: Things are great now, but what will things be like [in the future]?" said Dan Thompson, an ecologist with the DuPage County Forest Preserve District. "Will something we bring in now haunt us down the road?"
Biological control uses an outsider to beat an outsider. When purple loosestrife, a flowering weed native to Europe, began taking over fields and forests in Illinois, officials turned to an insect that loved snacking on the plant back in the old countries.
Galerucella calmariensis, a tiny brown beetle, was released across the Chicago area in the mid-1990s. Its success was dramatic. The purple tide receded where it had crowded out native species, and plants such as wild iris, Joe Pye weed, blue joint grass and turtlehead began to return.
"There were literally thousands and thousands of acres of loosestrife up here 10 years ago," said Ken Klick, a restoration ecologist with the Lake County Forest Preserve. "And though it's still around, you don't see the monocultures you used to. We're very pleased."
The loosestrife campaign led to plans to take on other Midwestern plagues. The next target on the hit list is garlic mustard.
Imported from Western Europe as a delicacy in the 1860s, the piquant herb gradually spread out of control, covering forest floors like a carpet and smothering already established plants.
Within a year, researchers in Minnesota and New York hope to unleash a German weevil that devours garlic mustard from root to leaf. They've been looking at the bug for a decade, plying it with dozens of other plants to learn whether it might eat anything else.
"We want to make sure the only plant that will be attacked is garlic mustard," said Bernd Blossey, who is doing research at Cornell University.
Scientists have also looked for insects to combat teasel, an up-and-coming nuisance that has blanketed Illinois during the last 20 years. They have found contenders among European fleas and butterflies.
But the king of all plant invaders—buckthorn, an aggressively spreading shrub that starves native species of sunlight—might be the most resistant to an insect assault.
David Ragsdale, a professor of entomology at University of Minnesota who is researching buckthorn's insect enemies, said 50 species tested in Europe were rejected because they eat other vegetation. Meanwhile, the five he brought to his quarantine lab for further study—an aphidlike bug called a psyllid and various caterpillars—aren't voracious enough.
"The insects we've found so far are not exciting from my standpoint," he said. "They don't do a tremendous amount of damage [to buckthorn]."
He's still searching for other candidates, including insects that attack buckthorn found in Asia.
So far, the bugs that have been released in Illinois have been problem-free, but that's not always the case. The most notorious local example of biological control gone haywire is the multicolored Asian lady beetle, a bug brought to the U.S. as early as 1916 and used to control aphids on Southern pecan trees.
With no natural predators in this country—birds don't care for the foul-smelling goo within the beetles—they multiplied quickly, becoming an inescapable annoyance in Illinois and elsewhere.
More serious is the case of an Argentine moth that dines on prickly pear cactus. Australians imported the creature in the 1920s to curb the spread of the cactus, which had been planted as a living fence. The moth worked splendidly, said George Schneider, biological administrator with the Florida Department of Agriculture.
Then other countries started using the moth, and in 1989 it appeared unbidden in the Sunshine State, chewing its way through already rare cactus species. It has since spread west, and agricultural officials fear eco-disaster should it make it to cactus-rich regions in Texas and Mexico.
Researchers are trying to curb its spread by releasing irradiated moths that will mate with the cactus killers to produce sterile offspring, Schneider said.
Experts say biological control will expand as global trade, intentionally or otherwise, brings more invasive plants to the U.S. Some say the risks should be measured against the environmental damage of herbicides and the certain toll of inaction.
"Are you willing to go out every year and cut and cut and spray and spray just to hold the line, or can you look for some solution that lasts for a long time?" said Dave Voegtlin of the Illinois Natural History Survey, which helped to introduce the loosestrife-eating beetle.
"Exotics continue to come in. Our water and soil are just full of them. They're changing the dynamics of our system."
Innocent-looking plants threaten biodiversity
By ALMA GAUL - Lee News Service Writer
Oh, what a pretty plant!
Well, maybe not.
If you are standing in a Midwest forest and find yourself surrounded by a white-blooming plant called garlic mustard or in a Western streambed surrounded by pink-blooming salt cedar, the attractive quality of the blooms is canceled by the threat these plants pose to the environment.
Garlic mustard and salt cedar are two nonnative, invasive species that decrease biodiversity because they crowd out native plants and, ultimately, the wildlife that depends on native plants for food and shelter.
In some respects, invasive plants destroy natural areas just as surely as if those areas had been bulldozed, only in a different way. It is estimated that more than $34 million is spent every year to control invasives, and the costs continue to grow.

